Bangladesh’s 13th Parliament has begun with high expectations following major political change driven by public আন্দোলন and sacrifice. People hoped this new phase would lead to serious discussions on reforming the state structure, especially the constitution.

However, early controversy has emerged over the proposal to form a Constitutional Reform Council and disagreements about how reforms should be carried out. The debate is not just about legal procedures—it is mainly about the process and source of legitimacy for constitutional change.

While there is broad agreement that reforms are necessary to prevent future misuse of power, political parties differ on how to implement them. Some support deep structural changes, while others prefer a gradual approach.

A referendum has already shown public support for giving elected representatives the authority to reform the constitution. Still, disagreements continue over the role, power, and legality of a reform council.

At its core, the debate raises a fundamental question: should constitutional change be limited by existing rules, or should it be driven by the will of the people?

Ultimately, the goal is to build a stronger democratic system and prevent authoritarianism, and constitutional reform is seen as a key step toward that objective.