Dhaka 11:41 am, Sunday, 10 November 2024

Shakib questioned Nazmul’s decision

  • Reporter Name
  • Update Time : 08:06:44 pm, Saturday, 22 June 2024
  • 175 Time View

The question arose right from the start of the Indian innings. Which is stronger at the end of the innings. Why captain Nazmul Hossain sent India to bat after winning the toss on such a wicket?

This match is almost over after India scored 196. Bangladesh has never scored 200 runs in T20, not that. But it is better to consider them as exceptions. As soon as the opponent scored 180-190 runs, the game started to feel unfamiliar to Bangladesh. Same here.

It was not difficult to understand that Shakib did not agree with Nazmul’s decision to win the toss and field. The all-rounder of Bangladesh came to the press conference after the match. When asked there if he now feels batting first would have been better, Shakib said, ‘If you ask me, in one or two matches in the Caribbean (teams won the toss and then batted)…England seems to have chased 180 in one match. . Otherwise the rule is to bat first, the teams are succeeding in it. Keeping that in mind, maybe it would have been better to bat first. However, the captain and the coach may have thought that if they could be kept to one run, the task would be easier. It will be known how many runs to score.

He is the most experienced player in the team, having played in all 9 T20 World Cups. He was the captain a few days ago. What would be done if the toss was won, was his opinion taken? Shakib said that it was not taken. It is not a complaint. He himself explained, ‘These decisions are taken by the captain and the coach. If they are good they get credit, if they are bad they are criticized. That’s the rule.’ After that he smiled and said, ‘When no wicket fell in the first two overs, maybe everyone thought that it would have been better to bat first. Again, if the wicket fell in the first two overs, that decision would have been correct.

Against a team like India, Bangladesh started the attack with spin at both ends with the new ball. At one end was Shakib. Whose first over came 15 runs. Rohit also hit a four and a six in the first three balls of that over before dismissing Sharma. The first 9 balls gave a total of 25 runs. It was clear that Shakib did not like the idea of ​​starting with spin at both ends. “It’s hard for me to explain,” he started, but then said, “It was a very good batting wicket.” I think it’s easier for spinners in the Caribbean to bowl the middle overs than the new ball. Because all teams want to score fast with the new ball. When the ball gets old it becomes a bit difficult to run.

 

Tag :

Write Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save Your Email and Others Information

About Author Information

Shakib questioned Nazmul’s decision

Update Time : 08:06:44 pm, Saturday, 22 June 2024

The question arose right from the start of the Indian innings. Which is stronger at the end of the innings. Why captain Nazmul Hossain sent India to bat after winning the toss on such a wicket?

This match is almost over after India scored 196. Bangladesh has never scored 200 runs in T20, not that. But it is better to consider them as exceptions. As soon as the opponent scored 180-190 runs, the game started to feel unfamiliar to Bangladesh. Same here.

It was not difficult to understand that Shakib did not agree with Nazmul’s decision to win the toss and field. The all-rounder of Bangladesh came to the press conference after the match. When asked there if he now feels batting first would have been better, Shakib said, ‘If you ask me, in one or two matches in the Caribbean (teams won the toss and then batted)…England seems to have chased 180 in one match. . Otherwise the rule is to bat first, the teams are succeeding in it. Keeping that in mind, maybe it would have been better to bat first. However, the captain and the coach may have thought that if they could be kept to one run, the task would be easier. It will be known how many runs to score.

He is the most experienced player in the team, having played in all 9 T20 World Cups. He was the captain a few days ago. What would be done if the toss was won, was his opinion taken? Shakib said that it was not taken. It is not a complaint. He himself explained, ‘These decisions are taken by the captain and the coach. If they are good they get credit, if they are bad they are criticized. That’s the rule.’ After that he smiled and said, ‘When no wicket fell in the first two overs, maybe everyone thought that it would have been better to bat first. Again, if the wicket fell in the first two overs, that decision would have been correct.

Against a team like India, Bangladesh started the attack with spin at both ends with the new ball. At one end was Shakib. Whose first over came 15 runs. Rohit also hit a four and a six in the first three balls of that over before dismissing Sharma. The first 9 balls gave a total of 25 runs. It was clear that Shakib did not like the idea of ​​starting with spin at both ends. “It’s hard for me to explain,” he started, but then said, “It was a very good batting wicket.” I think it’s easier for spinners in the Caribbean to bowl the middle overs than the new ball. Because all teams want to score fast with the new ball. When the ball gets old it becomes a bit difficult to run.